6. Formative incidents in my early acupuncture life: Lessons from the master, JR Worsley
When I am teaching, a question I am asked often serves to
remind me of some important incident which took place during my training or my
early years as a practitioner, which I now know set me thinking quite
differently about my practice. Each of
these incidents proved a catalyst, opening up new directions to my
thoughts. I am surprised to find how
many such important events have occurred in my acupuncture life, and appreciate
now that without them I would not have made the often unconventional detours I
did. Much of my development as a five
element acupuncturist, and reflected now in my writings, has been based on what
could be considered the rather unconventional approach I have adopted when
measured against that of many of my peers.
I have often thought that the tone was firmly set early on
when I was asked to teach an evening class about acupuncture at a London evening institute
at a time well before complementary practices were in such common use as they
are today. This was also when I had only
just qualified. It meant that I was free
to develop my own thoughts about my practice unhampered by others, since there
weren’t any others around doing what I was doing. I found myself talking about five element
acupuncture to a very wide range of lay people, and therefore had to couch my
thoughts in very general terms, rather than assume that my audience and I spoke
the common language familiar to all acupuncturists. I taught at several of these institutes
during the first few years of my practice, allowing the differing groups of people
who came to my classes to influence how I expressed myself and how far what I
was learning from my practice could be translated into a language they could
all understand, from the builder, the retired postman, the young student, the
bank clerk and the unemployed people who crowded into my classes evening after
evening.
This allowed me a freedom to be cherished, something I did
not realise until later, for I was able to develop my own ideas quite
independently of other professional acupuncturists, and quite unhampered or
inhibited by opinions about the practice of acupuncture which might well have
differed from mine. When I rejoined my
fellow acupuncturists two years later as part of my first advanced training
course under JR Worsley, I brought the often rather odd ideas I had developed
into my time with him, a time which proved to be the most exhilarating of all my
years of acupuncture training. It also
proved to be a time of heightened tension in the five element world as it
coincided with JR Worsley’s own fight to keep the college he had nurtured so
carefully for the past 20 years untainted by the introduction of other less
traditional forms of acupuncture as he felt strongly it would be. Eventually he lost this fight and had to
resign, and this led almost directly to my starting the School of Five Element
Acupuncture (SOFEA) with the express intention of continuing his work of spreading
the practice of this branch of acupuncture, and often, to my delight, with his active
support.
I took every opportunity I could to observe JR in his
interactions with patients, and was fortunate that the time of my postgraduate
training with him coincided with his last years at Leamington.
There was therefore a rather febrile atmosphere at the Leamington
college during my last years there, with acupuncturists lining up on one side
or the other of unfortunately an increasingly hostile divide. Sensing this, I made every effort to stay as
close to JR as I could, attending all his seminars and taking many patients to
private consultations with him. I view
these few final years at Leamington as forming
my own personal apprenticeship to the master of five element acupuncture.
It was during this period of intense activity that I
experienced many of the seminal moments which have set my acupuncture practice
on such a fulfilling course. In
particular I am now enjoying reliving some of the profound lessons I learnt
when studying with JR. The first of these occurred when I was sitting in the
classroom at the Leamington college during a
lunch break watching a video of JR with a patient, in which he was asking the
young patient a question. I remember her
looking puzzled, thinking for a minute, and then saying, “I’m not sure how to
answer that”. Unnoticed by me, JR had
come into the classroom, and was standing behind me. I heard him murmur, “Only a II CF would say
that”. Translated into the acupuncture
language in common use now this meant that only a Fire person who was Inner
Fire (the Small Intestine is given the Roman numeral II in five element
acupuncture) would express herself in those terms. Not only did this teach me a lot about the
distinctions to be made between Outer Fire’s much more articulate responses to
a question and Inner Fire’s verbal hesitancy as it tries to sort its thoughts
out, it also taught me a lot about myself, and has continued to do so over the
years, for it has made me, an Inner Fire person, so much clearer to
myself. So, I asked myself, was this the
way I respond to questions, with the initial brief air of puzzlement this patient
showed, before finally deciding on an answer to give which satisfies the Small
Intestine’s need to pass only what is pure on to the Heart? Now, whenever I try to work out whether a
person’s Fire element is that of Inner or Outer Fire, I always draw on the
image of this girl’s puzzled face to help me decide.
One of the tips I also learnt from JR Worsley, which I have
followed successfully ever since in all cases where my relationship to my
patient is under some strain, is always to be honest with the patient, and tell
them as soon as I sense that there is a problem. You need to be brave enough to ask them
whether they, too, feel that this is so.
I always preface what I say with the words, “I feel that ….” Saying this removes any risk of the patient
feeling that we are blaming them for what is not right, and gives them the
courage to be open with us. I am then
often surprised by my patients’ answers, which may be quite different from what
I have imagined. This frankness between
us goes a long way to solving some of the tricky patient/practitioner issues
which complicate our work.
For treatment to be successful it is always essential that
both patient and practitioner are equally involved, 50% the patient and 50% the
practitioner. We cannot do good work if
we are not sure what is going on in the practice room. It is therefore good to remember that we can
never help a patient who is reluctant to receive treatment. As soon as we sense this, we need to stop
what we are doing and address the issue.
No comments:
Post a Comment